FSD /Insolvency Court Ruling –
Further Information
Following our
announcement about the FSD/Insolvency Court Ruling delivered on December 10th
2010 we have received many questions from members
asking us to clarify what the ruling means in terms of their future pension
benefits.
First, we want to reassure all
members that, whatever happens, you will continue to be entitled to at least the
benefits determined by PPF rules, both now and in the future.
Improving
those benefits beyond PPF levels will be driven solely by how successful your Trustees
are in recovering monies from the various global Nortel insolvency proceedings.
If we manage to recover at least
£700M then we will have the opportunity to go to external insurers and attempt
to purchase better-than-PPF-level benefits. In order to purchase full Plan benefits for members we would
need to recover approximately £2,100M.
We, in
conjunction with the PPF, have lodged a claim against the Plan’s sponsoring
employer, Nortel Networks UK Limited (NNUK), for the full £2,100M (this is
referred to as the “Full Claim” below). It is important to understand that the
December 10th ruling does not
directly impact the status of the Full Claim against
NNUK in any way since the ruling relates only to claims arising from the
Pensions Regulator’s FSD determination against twenty-one Nortel EMEA companies
other than NNUK (EMEA Claim). The
status of the Full Claim against NNUK remains that of a ‘normal unsecured
creditor’.
The December
10th ruling arose from court action instigated by Ernst & Young
(E&Y) acting in their capacity as administrators for the twenty-one Nortel
EMEA companies. E&Y asked the court to rule that the EMEA Claim had almost
no status whatsoever and ranked below that of a normal unsecured creditor. As we now know, the court rejected the
E&Y position and decided that the EMEA Claim was to be
treated as an ‘expense of the administration’, thus having priority over
almost all other creditors.
This is
great news because it means that we have the opportunity to recover monies
directly from other EMEA companies in addition to NNUK. However
there are two cautionary points to keep in mind:
·
E&Y
may decide to appeal the ruling and have until January 10th 2011 to
do this. We cannot and should not
speculate on what the
·
The
Pensions Regulator has yet to decide how much of the Full Claim should be directed at the 21 Nortel EMEA companies. There is
a duty on the Pensions Regulator to act ‘reasonably’ when making this decision,
and have regard to the claims of other creditors of those companies.
Although
the ruling is a welcome development there is still a
long way to go and we hope that members will understand that it would be
entirely inappropriate to speculate at this time on how it might affect members’
benefits going forward.
Finally,
many of you will be aware that the Pensions Regulator’s FSD determination
included a further four Nortel companies, all based in
We will
continue to keep members advised of progress.